top of page
Search

Scooby-Doo(2002)

ree


Scooby-Doo(2002) is a compromised product. Themes of generational displacement, self-worth, and found family are touched upon but never fully explored or resolved. The studio-mandated family-friendly tone with the raunchy teen comedy humor led to an incohesive tone.


The incohesive tone leads to inane drama filled with cliches and clumsy narrative choices. The one-dimensional characters are archetypes that provide cursory character development, stunted growth, and decent likability. Overall, Scooby-Doo is a misfire.


Technically, Scooby-Doo is lackluster. Its flat direction leads to an incohesive tone and a generic visual style. Framing, pans, and focus define the flat cinematography. The hammy and exaggerated acting comes across as annoying and one-dimensional.


The cartoonish aesthetic defines the production design, giving it a whimsical tone. The minimal sound consists of risers, animal sounds, cartoon hits, and belches. The score consists of mellow pop songs and whimsical, cartoonish music, which feels unoriginal and bland.


The youthful cast conveys fame, fit, and provides a unique drive to the film. The dated and corny effects lead to a lack of tangibility and provide a sense of unreality to it. Overall, Scooby-Doo is a lackluster mess.



Writing: 4/10

Direction: 5/10

Cinematography: 5/10

Acting: 4/10

Editing: 5/10

Sound: 5/10

Score: 6/10

Prod Design: 6/10

Casting: 8/10

Effects: 4/10

Overall Score: 5.2/10

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by sohan movie and book reviews. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page